Back Next

HCMAG Home
Overview
Introduction
Getting Started
Problem 1
Problem 2
Problem 3
Problem 4
Problem 5
Problem Index
Datasets
Search

Sub-problem 2d - Page 5 of 7

ID# C402D05

Sub-problem 2d: How Can We Improve the Level of Service at the Ramp Junction at the Northbound On-Ramp to I-87?

Exhibits 4-35 and 4-36 show the effect of adding a lane to the ramp so that two lanes are maintained on the ramp for its entire length from Alternate Route 7 to I-87 North.

Exhibit 4-35. Additional Ramp Lane Input Data

Freeway data PM Peak (Before) PM Peak (After)
Dataset 21 Dataset 22
Number of lanes, N 3 3
Free flow speed, SFF 55 55
Volume 4,800 4,800
Ramp data PM Peak (Before) PM Peak (After)
Ramp volume 1,900 1,900
Number of lanes on-ramp, N 1 2
Length of acceleration lane, LA 500 500
 
Exhibit 4-36. Additional Ramp Lane Output Data
  PM Peak (Before) PM Peak (After)
Output data Dataset 21 Dataset 22
PFM 0.59 0.56
V12, pc/h 3,154 2,960
VFO actual 7,444 7,444
VFO maximum 6,750 6,750
VR12 actual 5,265 5,071
VR12 maximum 4,600 4,600
Density, pc/mi/lane 42.5 34.7
LOS for ramp-freeway junction area of influence F F
Speed-ramp influence area, mph 41.6 44.5
Speed-outer lanes, mph 49.0 48.0
Speed-all vehicles, mph 43.5 45.6

After reviewing the output data shown in Exhibit 4-36, consider the following questions:
bullet

What is the most significant change in the performance of the merge area as a result of the addition of the lane to the freeway mainline?

bulletDoes the addition of the lane produce acceptable performance of the merge area?

Discussion:
Take a few minutes to consider these questions. When you are ready, continue to the next page.

[ Back ] [ Continue ] with Sub-Problem 2d