Sub-problem 1b - Page 3 of 7 |
ID# C401B03 |
Sub-problem 1b: Analysis of
the Eastbound Freeway Section
The basic freeway analysis methodology is shown in
Exhibit 4-11. The inputs
required include
geometric data, a
free-flow speed (FFS) (or a free flow speed derived from a
basic free-flow speed) and volume information. The left-hand branch
addresses actions you have to take to obtain the free-flow speed while the
right hand branch focuses on the computation of a peak 15-minute flow rate.
We’ll consider the left-hand branch first.
Free-flow speed (FFS)
can be measured in the field or estimated using the procedure outlined in
Chapter 23. We’ll consider
both.
The benefit of having speed-flow
data as shown in
Exhibit 4-8 in this case study is that we can select a FFS and no adjustments
are necessary. If you look at that
figure, you can see that a
value in the range of 55 mph is a good
choice. This range reflects the average maximum speed when the flow rate
relatively low. We’ll assume that 55 mph is the right value.
However, it’s useful to see what FFS estimate we would get if we trace
through the branch labeled "if BFFS is input." We then take a basic
free-flow speed (BFFS) and make adjustments to it to account for lane width,
the number of lanes, the interchange density, and lateral clearances.
Nominally, the basic free flow speed (BFFS)
is how fast vehicles are traveling when the volumes are very light. The HCM
assumes the BFFS is BFFS is 70 mph in urban settings and 75 mph in rural
settings.
Exhibit 4-8 shows that both of these values are too high for this
facility. The maximum speed when the flow is almost zero is about 60 mph.
The HCM allows us to use a local value rather than the defaults. We’re going
to do that and assume the BFFS is 60 mph.
[
Back ] [ Continue ] with
Sub-problem 1b