For the input data that we are considering here, the results are summarized in
Exhibit 1-9.
Exhibit 1-9.
U.S.
95/Styner Avenue-Lauder Avenue
(Dataset1)
Delay,
Queue Length, and Level of Service - Existing Volumes |
Approach |
NB |
SB |
Westbound |
Eastbound |
Movement |
1 |
4 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
Lane configuration |
L |
L |
L |
|
TR |
L |
|
TR |
v (vph) |
31 |
59 |
55 |
|
205 |
50 |
|
155 |
c (vph) |
1,024 |
1,163 |
170 |
|
359 |
134 |
|
329 |
v/c |
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.32 |
|
0.57 |
0.37 |
|
0.47 |
95% queue length (vehicles) |
0.1 |
0.2 |
1.3 |
|
3.4 |
1.6 |
|
2.4 |
Control delay (sec/veh) |
8.6 |
8.3 |
36.0 |
|
27.6 |
47.0 |
|
25.3 |
LOS |
A |
A |
E |
|
D |
E |
|
D |
Approach delay (sec/veh) |
-- |
-- |
29.3 |
30.6 |
Approach LOS |
-- |
-- |
D |
D |
The table shown above provides a substantial amount of information
regarding the forecasted operation of the intersection, including the estimated
capacity, v/c ratio, queue length, and delay. What information from the
table is most
relevant to our analysis?
Discussion:
Take a few minutes to review
the data presented in this table. Document what you consider to be some of
the key aspects of these results. When you are ready to continue, click
the continue button below to proceed.
[ Back ] [ Continue
] with Sub-Problem 1a