| 
    Sub-problem 2a - Page 4 of 6 | 
          
           ID# C102A04  | 
         
       
      
     
    Sub-problem 2a: Analysis of the 
    Existing TWSC Intersection Considering the Effects of the Adjacent Intersections 
Step 2. Results 
The HCM procedure produces the following results for each minor stream movement: 
    
        | 
       capacity of the movement and 
      the capacity of the lane or lanes  |  
        | 
       delay for the movement and the 
      weighted average delay for each lane  |  
        | 
       95th-percentile queue for each lane  |  
        | level of service for each lane |  
     
These results are summarized in Exhibit 1-20, for the 
existing volumes. 
    
      
        
        Exhibit 1-20.
        U.S. 
        95/Styner-Lauder Avenue (Dataset9) 
        Delay, 
        Queue Length, and Level of Service - Existing Volumes | 
       
      
        | Approach | 
        NB | 
        SB | 
        Westbound | 
        Eastbound | 
       
      
        | Movement | 
        1 | 
        4 | 
        7 | 
        8 | 
        9 | 
        10 | 
        11 | 
        12 | 
       
      
        | Lane configuration | 
        L | 
        L | 
        L | 
          | 
        TR | 
        L | 
          | 
        TR | 
       
      
        | v (vph) | 
        31 | 
        59 | 
        55 | 
        205 | 
        50 | 
        155 | 
       
      
        | C (m) (vph) | 
        1024 | 
        1163 | 
        170 | 
        359 | 
        134 | 
        329 | 
       
      
        | v/c | 
        0.03 | 
        0.05 | 
        0.32 | 
        0.57 | 
        0.37 | 
        0.47 | 
       
      
        | 95% queue length | 
        0.09 | 
        0.16 | 
        1.31 | 
        3.39 | 
        1.56 | 
        2.41 | 
       
      
        | Control delay | 
        8.6 | 
        8.3 | 
        36.0 | 
        27.6 | 
        47.0 | 
        25.3 | 
       
      
        | LOS | 
        A | 
        A | 
        E | 
        D | 
        E | 
        D | 
       
      
        | Approach delay | 
        -- | 
        -- | 
        29.3 | 
        30.6 | 
       
      
        | Approach LOS | 
        -- | 
        -- | 
        D | 
        D | 
       
 
    Discussion: 
     If we review the results 
    produced when we consider the effect of arrival patterns from the Sweet 
    Avenue signal (above), we see that there is no difference from our
    previous analysis. Why? 
    
    [ Back ] [ Continue 
    ] with Sub-Problem 2a  |