Sub-problem 3a - Page 4 of 9 |
ID# C103A04 |
Sub-problem 3a: Oversaturated
Intersection Analysis
Data were collected for a typical post-football game
period at the U.S. 95/Styner Avenue-Lauder Avenue intersection. Exhibit
1-27 shows the demand (flow rates in veh/hr) for the
four 15-minute periods immediately following the football game:
Exhibit
1-27. U.S.95/Styner-Lauder
Avenue Intersection Demand Volumes |
15-min time period
beginning |
Eastbound |
Westbound |
Northbound |
Southbound |
LT |
TH |
RT |
LT |
TH |
RT |
LT |
TH |
RT |
LT |
TH |
RT |
4:00 pm |
40 |
55 |
175 |
50 |
50 |
75 |
100 |
815 |
45 |
40 |
700 |
55 |
4:15 pm |
50 |
75 |
375 |
55 |
80 |
125 |
215 |
1,025 |
50 |
59 |
1,975 |
165 |
4:30 pm |
30 |
75 |
125 |
45 |
75 |
115 |
20 |
975 |
35 |
55 |
1,200 |
145 |
4:45 pm |
45 |
60 |
175 |
55 |
85 |
150 |
145 |
1,015 |
45 |
50 |
1,350 |
130 |
How will the intersection perform, under both signal
control and stop sign control, for these demand conditions? How should
we proceed with this analysis?
We will first consider the operational performance of the
intersection operating under today's control conditions (two-way
stop-control) to confirm what we suspect: the high volumes on the main
street (U.S. 95) will cause long delays on the side streets (Styner and Lauder
Avenues). If this is found to be the case, it may further support a
recommendation that signalization is a valid
option to handle current and future traffic volumes. Even so, it is
important to note that event-related conditions would not, by themselves,
be sufficient justification for installing a traffic signal at this
intersection.
We will then consider the operation of the intersection
under signal control. Here, we will break down the analysis into four
steps, one for each of the four time periods, in sequence, starting with the
4:00 p.m. to 4:15 p.m. time period.
[ Back ] [ Continue
] with Sub-Problem 3a