Sub-problem 3a - Page 8 of 9 |
ID# C103A08 |
Sub-problem 3a: Oversaturated
Intersection Analysis
Exhibit 1-32 shows both the initial and revised demands for
time period 3 (4:30 - 4:45 pm):
Exhibit
1-32. Service
Volumes vs. Demand Volumes at Styner-Lauder under Signal Control (4:30 -
4:45 pm) |
Time
Period |
Eastbound |
Westbound |
Northbound |
Southbound |
LT |
TH |
RT |
LT |
TH |
RT |
LT |
TH |
RT |
LT |
TH |
RT |
Initial demand (veh/hr), time period 3 |
45 |
60 |
175 |
55 |
85 |
150 |
20 |
1,015 |
45 |
50 |
1,350 |
130 |
Excess demand from time period 2 |
|
6 |
28 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
54 |
5 |
Final demand (veh/hr), time period 3 |
45 |
66 |
203 |
55 |
85 |
150 |
108 |
1,015 |
45 |
50 |
1,405 |
135 |
For this analysis, we will use the initial demand. In
addition, we will use the excess demand as the initial queue, or unmet
demand, that is one of the required parameters in the computation of control delay in the HCM Chapter
16 procedure. The results of this analysis, for time period 3 (4:30 -
4:45 pm), are
shown in Exhibit 1-33:
Exhibit 1-33. Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and
LOS Determination at Styner-Lauder under Signal Control (4:30 - 4:45 pm) (Dataset17) |
Approach |
EB |
WB |
NB |
SB |
Movement |
LT |
TH/RT |
LT |
TH/RT |
LT |
TH/RT |
LT |
TH/RT |
Adj flow rate |
45 |
235 |
55 |
235 |
20 |
1,060 |
50 |
1,480 |
Lane group capacity |
257 |
422 |
257 |
430 |
149 |
2,097 |
247 |
2,082 |
v/c ratio |
0.18 |
0.56 |
0.21 |
0.55 |
0.13 |
0.51 |
0.20 |
0.71 |
Green ratio |
0.25 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
0.58 |
0.58 |
0.58 |
0.58 |
Control delay |
19.1 |
31.9 |
19.7 |
24.5 |
193.5 |
8.3 |
5.5 |
9.5 |
Lane group LOS |
B |
C |
B |
C |
F |
A |
A |
A |
Approach delay |
29.9 |
23.6 |
11.7 |
9.4 |
Approach LOS |
C |
C |
B |
A |
Intersection delay |
13.3 |
Intersection LOS |
B |
The unserved demand that was present at the end of time
period 2 (4:15 - 4:30 pm) was successfully served during time period 3 (4:30
- 4:45 pm). The delay for
the NB LT movement is still quite high, but all volume/capacity ratios are less
than 1.0. Therefore, the analysis of the effects of oversaturation can be
considered to be complete.
It is worth noting that
the control delay reported in Exhibit 1-33 includes the additional delay
experienced by vehicles in the residual queue that was transferred to time
period 3 from time period 2. The HCM procedure accounts for the carryover of
excess demand through the third (d3) term of the delay equation.
We will still want to analyze the last 15-minute time period in order
to determine the average control delay for the hour, and this is done on the
next page.
[ Back ] [ Continue ] with
Sub-Problem 3a