Sub-problem 4b - Page 2 of 2 |
ID# C104B02 |
Sub-problem 4b: Effect of Unit
Extension
Remember that, at the outset of this problem, we assumed
that the unit
extension times would be set to 3 seconds for single lane operation and 2
seconds for multiple-lane operation. These are
commonly-used values for the unit extension and are consistent with an
expected saturation flow rate of about 1,900 vehicles per lane per hour of
green. Under these conditions, the 2/3-second unit extension values can be
expected to have the effect of extending the green phase beyond its minimum
length only so long as vehicle spacing is not much greater than one would
expect under saturation flow rate conditions.
As a further illustration of the effect of the traffic
actuated settings, let us examine what would happen to the operation of the
Styner-Lauder/U.S. 95 intersection if we increased the unit extension times
for all phases to 5 seconds each. This would mean that a phase would not terminate until a five-second gap was
observed between vehicles on any approach. In other words, the controller
would be waiting for stragglers instead of passing control to the next phase
after the queue of vehicles has been serviced.
Exhibit 1-40 summarizes the results of this exercise. Using the same Appendix B
procedures that we used in sub-problem 4a, we can see that the average phase times
have increased from 15 and 16 seconds to 19 and 24 seconds, respectively.
The cycle length has increased from 31 seconds to 43 seconds. It is also
interesting to note that the apportionment of green time now favors the
arterial movement to a greater extent, because the longer north-south
maximum green time has allowed this phase to be extended more than the
east-west phase. This is also evident in the proportionately greater
increase in the east-west delays that are now being predicted.
Exhibit 1-40. Impact of Increased Unit Extension Times
on Styner-Lauder/U.S. 95 Intersection |
Movement |
Short Unit Extensions
(Sub-problem 4a)
|
Long Unit Extensions
(5 sec each)
|
Phase Time |
Delay |
Phase Time |
Delay |
Eastbound |
15 |
7.9 |
19 |
10.8 |
Westbound |
15 |
8.3 |
19 |
11.3 |
Northbound |
16 |
7.4 |
24 |
7.6 |
Southbound |
16 |
7.9 |
24 |
8.1 |
Intersection Cycle |
31 |
7.8 |
43 |
8.9 |
Based on the information shown in
Exhibit 1-40, is it better to use the originally-estimated unit extension
values of 2-3 seconds, or the 5-second unit extension value assumed for this
sub-problem? The answer depends on what the analyst is trying to accomplish and the
environment in which the signalized intersection is located. In the case of
the Styner-Lauder/U.S. 95 intersection, it might be appropriate to use the
longer unit extensions on the northbound and southbound approaches of the
state highway in order to favor and benefit through traffic. The shorter
unit extensions might be appropriate to use on the eastbound and westbound
side street approaches in order to minimize overall intersection delay and
cycle length. An alternative approach, however, could also be used with
equal validity.
[ Back ] [ Continue
] to Sub-Problem 4c