Sub-problem 6d - Page 2 of 4 |
ID# C106D02 |
Sub-problem 6d: Planning Analysis at SH-8 Intersection
The twenty-year projected volumes for this intersection,
adjusted for the peak period factor are shown in Exhibit 1-54.
Exhibit 1-54. 20 Year Projected Volumes at SH 8 |
Approach |
LT (veh/hr) |
TH (veh/hr) |
RT (veh/hr) |
Eastbound |
73 |
774 |
687 |
Westbound |
254 |
0 |
574 |
Northbound |
0 |
657 |
305 |
Southbound |
0 |
0 |
0 |
This is an unusual intersection that will require careful thought before
applying the quick estimation method. Look again at
Exhibit 1-4. The departure roadway to the north is
one-way away from the intersection, and the west leg of the intersection is
one-way eastbound. Therefore, there is no westbound through
movement, no northbound left turn, and no southbound traffic at all.
|
Exhibit
1-55. Existing Signal Phasing at SH8/U.S. 95 Intersection |
So, the first thing to consider is the type of treatment (permitted,
protected, protected plus permitted or not opposed) to specify for each of
the left turns. Exhibit 1-55 shows the signal phasing that is currently
being used. The eastbound and westbound movements are fully separated, and
so the "Not Opposed" treatment will apply. While the northbound and southbound
left turns do not exist, they must be specified as permitted because of the
way that the quick estimation method represents traffic movements. For more
detail on this subject, see the discussion presented under
sub-problem 6c.
[
Back ]
[
Continue ]
with Sub-Problem 6d