Sub-problem 1b - Page 2 of 9 |
ID# C201B02 |
Sub-problem 1b: Maxwell
Drive PM Peak Hour - With Conditions
Configuration Issues
Finding the best lane configuration for a
new or revised intersection is one of the most exciting things a traffic
engineer does. When a plan you develop works well, it’s invigorating to
see it in action.
For Maxwell Drive, with
the new site traffic, we have an opportunity to see what designs will work
best. There isn’t going to be just one right answer; most likely, there
will be several. That’s usually the case with design problems.
We’re going to start
by examining the volumes for the "with" condition (presented in
Exhibit
2-14), independent of what actually exists on the ground right now. For example, the
intersection was originally constructed wide enough to accommodate a
southbound through lane if a fourth leg were ever to be added to the
intersection. In the interim, the extra width has been used to accommodate
dual southbound left-turn lanes. But, are dual left-turn lanes really
going to be needed? The volumes suggest that we’re likely
to need at least one southbound left-turn lane, and maybe two. Two would
produce a per-lane match between the northbound and southbound lefts,
ignoring lane utilization. If we don’t use two, we might be able to
convert the second one into a through lane or a
through-and-something lane. Although the northbound lefts are not as
heavy (150) as the southbound lefts, they are significant. A left-turn
lane (opposing the southbound left-turn lane) would be wise. The through volumes are small both north and southbound.
That means one through lane should be plenty. We could even combine the throughs and rights.
Now, let’s
study lane configuration options. At the same time, we need to think about
the signal timing plan. There are two tools to do this. One is the HCM planning method for
signalized intersections. The other is critical lane
analysis. It’s a simple, back-of-the-envelope technique for
seeing what geometric/signal timing combinations might work. (The critical
lane technique is discussed in most traffic engineering textbooks and
handbooks, and it’s the method for signal timing presented in the HCM.)
In each of these two
analyses, we’re going to look at different lane configurations, phasing,
signal timing, and cycle length. Acceptable cycle lengths range from
40-120 seconds, although longer and shorter values are possible.
Discussion:
It's important to note in this sub-problem that several analysis
techniques are being applied/explored. You should think about whether
there are others you might have used and the results you would have
gotten.
[ Back ] [ Continue ]
to HCM Planning Method