Problem 6 Findings - Page 1 of 1 |
ID# C2060F1 |
Problem
6: Route 146 Arterial Study
Findings
Our
first run involved simulating the network using the signal timings
developed in the HCM analyses. Complete datasets for the two main runs we performed
are available for T7F1
and T7F2
signal timings.
The output datasets for each of these runs are in Dataset
81 and Dataset
82, respectively. Except for Maxwell Drive, the timings we
developed in the HCM were adequate. Exhibit 2-68 shows a comparison among
three sets of timings for the network. The first are the timings we
obtained from the HCM analysis. The second are timings we hand-generated
in TRANSYT7-F to get acceptable v/c ratios for all of the lane groups. The
third are the timings developed by TRANSYT-7F when it optimized
coordinated operation across the network.
Exhibit 2-68. Route 146 Network Signal Timings from Three Sources
|
Phase |
Shen |
Moe |
Maxwell |
CCR |
Fire Road |
Route 9 |
HCM |
T7F1 |
T7F2 |
HCM |
T7F1 |
T7F2 |
HCM |
T7F1 |
T7F2 |
HCM |
T7F1 |
T7F2 |
HCM |
T7F1 |
T7F2 |
HCM |
T7F1 |
T7F2 |
1 |
29 |
31 |
77 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
10 |
16 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
- |
41 |
60 |
- |
23 |
16 |
2 |
7 |
7 |
5 |
22 |
22 |
77 |
29 |
28 |
46 |
14 |
14 |
15 |
- |
14 |
3 |
- |
36 |
19 |
3 |
10 |
8 |
16 |
14 |
14 |
16 |
11 |
21 |
28 |
27 |
27 |
31 |
- |
26 |
30 |
- |
39 |
22 |
4 |
20 |
21 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
2 |
6 |
18 |
18 |
18 |
- |
3 |
3 |
- |
5 |
7 |
5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
20 |
20 |
21 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
26 |
15 |
6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
22 |
15 |
T7F1: Hand-adjustment to
HCM results, uncoordinated simulation
T7F2: T7F-9 optimal timings at 110-second cycle length |
As you can see, at the
Shen entrance, we didn’t need to adjust the signal timings very much
to get acceptable performance from TRANSYT-7F at that intersection. The
same is true at Moe Road and Clifton Country Road. Only at Maxwell
Drive, and only for Phases 1 and 3 (the left-turn phases), that we needed
to adjust the signal timings (substantially) in TRANSYT-7F to get
acceptable v/c ratios.
The third green times
(T7F2) are the values developed by TRANSYT-7F in optimizing the
coordinated performance of the network. To give you a sense of the
performance improvement provided with the T7F1 signal timings, the
network had 300 vehicle-hours of delay (out of 455 total vehicle-hours of
travel), while in the optimized scenario (T7F2), there were 282
vehicle-hours of delay (8% less) out of 436 vehicle hours of travel. The
original signal timings were already fairly well matched to the traffic
flows.
One important point to
note about the analysis pertains to the westbound-to-southbound left turn
at the I-87 interchange. We specifically included the I-87 interchange as
a node in the network so we could look at the performance of this
movement. In the T7F1 run, this movement had a degree of saturation of 145%,
well above the 95% that TRANSYT-7F sets as an upper limit. We saw this as
a significant problem and determined that some action would have to be
taken to mitigate the long delays that occur there.
It is
interesting to note that in the T7F2 solution, that problem has been
rectified. TRANSYT-7F found a way to coordinate the signals at Clifton
Country Road and Fire Road so the left turn can have a degree of
saturation equal to 101%. This is not as good as the 95% that’s desirable,
but it is much better than the 145% we had in the first case.
[ Back ] [ Continue ] to Discussion