Sub-problem 1a - Page 4 of 4 |
ID# C501A04 |
Sub-problem 1a:
Analysis of the
Existing TWSC Intersection
Exhibit 5-13.
Existing Museum Road/Reitz Union Intersection Operations Considering
Pedestrians |
|
EB |
WB |
NB |
SB |
L |
T |
R |
L |
T |
R |
L |
T |
R |
L |
T |
R |
Queue w/Peds |
0.7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4.1 |
0 |
4.1 |
8.6 |
0 |
7.3 |
Queue w/o Peds |
0.4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.9 |
0 |
0.9 |
3.8 |
0 |
1.3 |
Delay w/Peds |
12.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
999 |
0 |
999 |
999 |
0 |
123.5 |
Delay w/o Peds |
9.4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
65.4 |
0 |
65.4 |
130.5 |
0 |
15.9 |
LOS w/Peds |
B |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
F |
- |
F |
F |
- |
F |
LOS w/o Peds |
A |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
F |
- |
F |
F |
- |
C |
The effects of
pedestrians on queues, delay, and even LOS can be dramatic. Exhibit 5-13
shows that, when pedestrians were considered,
delays for the northbound and southbound approaches increased very
substantially. This correctly reflects the effects of time blockage (21% on three
approaches) created by pedestrians at the stop-controlled approaches. The
results of this sensitivity analysis also emphasize the importance of
considering pedestrian effects in this particular case study, or in any
situation where pedestrian volumes can be expected to be significant.
Assuming the geometry and pedestrian
volumes remain unchanged from existing conditions, we can perform an analysis on the TWSC
intersection with projected traffic levels reflecting the additional volumes
generated by the new parking structure. Exhibit 5-14 provides details on
queue, delay, and LOS, comparing the current condition with projected traffic
and no improvements to the intersection:
Exhibit 5-14. Museum
at Reitz considering Current and Projected Traffic |
|
EB |
WB |
NB |
SB |
L |
T |
R |
L |
T |
R |
L |
T |
R |
L |
T |
R |
Queue Current |
0.7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4.1 |
0 |
4.1 |
8.6 |
0 |
7.3 |
Queue Projected |
6.7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4.1 |
0 |
4.1 |
29.1 |
0 |
50.1 |
Delay Current |
12.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
999 |
0 |
999 |
999 |
0 |
123.5 |
Delay Projected |
30.4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
999 |
0 |
999 |
999 |
0 |
999 |
LOS Current |
B |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
F |
- |
F |
F |
- |
F |
LOS Projected |
B |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
F |
- |
F |
F |
- |
F |
Obviously,
the effects of the projected additional traffic have been to exacerbate the
deficiencies previously identified in Exhibit 5-13. Delays
listed as 999 seconds per vehicle represent values where parameters, such as
the v/c ratios, drive the delay calculation to very high (>999 sec/veh)
values. Such high delay values are not realistic outcomes in the real world,
and reflect the reasonable conclusion that demand volumes are likely to
change before delays of this magnitude are reached. Also notice that the queue lengths have become substantially greater
under the projected future conditions. The numerical analysis results are
not as important here as the conclusion that, without mitigation, this
intersection is likely to operate unacceptably whether or not additional
traffic is realized from the proposed development.
[ Back ] [
Continue ] to
Sub-problem 1b