Sub-problem 1b - Page 4 of 4 |
ID# C501B04 |
Sub-problem 1b:
Analysis of the
Signalized Intersection with Projected Traffic
How can the delay at an unsignalized intersection be
compared with that at a signal?
These findings confirm the obvious, which is that
a signal imposes delay on the major street
through and right-turn movements, which would not have experienced these
delays if the intersection were to remain under two-way stop control. The
findings go beyond this to quantify the amount of delay likely to be
experienced by these major street movements. This is an important
consideration, since these are also the highest-volume movements at the
intersection. On the
other hand, delays are reduced substantially for all minor street movements.
So, which case really represents the better control strategy, in terms of
minimizing delay, for the overall intersection?
To better understand whether this is really an improvement to the operation of the intersection, at
least as defined by levels of delay, we must realize that these delay values
are expressed in terms of the average number of seconds of delay per vehicle. So, for comparison purposes, it is important to
apply these estimates to the number of vehicles affected for each movement.
To accomplish this, we can compute the total delay, in seconds, incurred by all
entering vehicles. This requires that we multiply the computed average
delays for each movement by the number of vehicles in each movement, and
that we perform this calculation for both the signalized and TWSC intersection scenarios. This comparison is
illustrated below:
Exhibit 5-17. Projected Museum at Reitz
comparing TWSC and Signal Control
|
|
EB |
WB |
NB |
SB |
L |
T |
R |
L |
T |
R |
L |
T |
R |
L |
T |
R |
Volume |
379 |
670 |
2 |
0 |
597 |
178 |
12 |
0 |
8 |
204 |
0 |
484 |
Delay TWSC |
30.4 |
0 |
0 |
10.2 |
0 |
0 |
999 |
0 |
999 |
999 |
0 |
999 |
Delay Signal |
584.6 |
17.8 |
17.8 |
10.4 |
24.2 |
24.2 |
27.3 |
0 |
27.3 |
35.5 |
0 |
286.5 |
Total Delay TWSC |
11,522 |
0 |
19,980 |
687,312 |
Total Delay Signal |
148,941 |
19,065 |
546 |
157,896 |
Intersection Delay |
TWSC |
718,814 |
Signal |
326,448 |
Difference |
392,366 (55%) |
As you can see, for
existing geometry and projected traffic, the intersection
actually performs better (less delay) under signalized control than under TWSC
control. Since the delays were
very large on the minor street movements under TWSC, values of 999 seconds
per vehicle were assumed (the delay equation actually predicts even
larger values than this). Even with this assumption, the delays on the minor street are
reduced significantly with signal control. The delays do increase for the
major street movements under signal control but are far outweighed by the
improvements on the minor street approaches.
It should be noted
that normally for undersaturated conditions, the benefit of zero delay for
the major street throughs and rights would outweigh the benefit to side
street traffic in this comparison. However, the very long delays estimated for the side street movements
under TWSC control are what determined the outcome of this comparison.
[
Back ] [ Continue ] to
Sub-problem 1c