Sub-problem 1c - Page 2 of 5 |
ID# C501C01 |
Sub-problem 1c:
Analysis of the Signal with Pedestrians and Bicycles
Testing an
alternative that requires pedestrians to cross on only two of the four
approaches might make sense here. Strategically, this can be orchestrated to
benefit the right turns that need it most. From a practical viewpoint, we
know the predominant pedestrian flow is from the southwest (student parking)
to the northeast (classes) and the reverse. Because the right turns are by
far the heaviest for the southbound and westbound vehicular movements, we
can consider closing the crosswalks on the western and northern legs of the
intersection. Of course, this would mean that the pedestrian and bicycle
flow rates for the closed crosswalks would have to be added to those left
open. Additionally, we should not forget that such an action would detract
from overall pedestrian accessibility and mobility, which may also be an
important consideration in and of itself. Thus, other factors besides the
vehicular operating characteristics of the intersection should also be
considered, and in some cases may have a direct bearing on the feasibility
of the various solution alternatives we would otherwise consider.
Discussion:
Consider
the potential treatment described above and consider how the various
stakeholders identified in the overview may react to this proposed
treatment.
[
Back ] [
Continue ] with Sub-problem 1c