| 
    Sub-problem 1c - Page 2 of 5 | 
          
           ID# C501C01  | 
        
      
      
     
    
    Sub-problem 1c: 
    Analysis of the Signal with Pedestrians and Bicycles
    Testing an 
    alternative that requires pedestrians to cross on only two of the four 
    approaches might make sense here. Strategically, this can be orchestrated to 
    benefit the right turns that need it most. From a practical viewpoint, we 
    know the predominant pedestrian flow is from the southwest (student parking) 
    to the northeast (classes) and the reverse. Because the right turns are by 
    far the heaviest for the southbound and westbound vehicular movements, we 
    can consider closing the crosswalks on the western and northern legs of the 
    intersection. Of course, this would mean that the pedestrian and bicycle 
    flow rates for the closed crosswalks would have to be added to those left 
    open. Additionally, we should not forget that such an action would detract 
    from overall pedestrian accessibility and mobility, which may also be an 
    important consideration in and of itself. Thus, other factors besides the 
    vehicular operating characteristics of the intersection should also be 
    considered, and in some cases may have a direct bearing on the feasibility 
    of the various solution alternatives we would otherwise consider.
    Discussion:
    
    
Consider 
    the potential treatment described above and consider how the various 
    stakeholders identified in the overview may react to this proposed 
    treatment.
    [
    Back ] [ 
    Continue ] with Sub-problem 1c