Back Next

HCMAG Home
Overview
Introduction
Getting Started
Problem 1
Problem 2
Problem 3
Datasets
Search

Problem 2 - Page 4 of 4

ID# C502004

Problem 2: Reitz Union Drive Intersection Improvement Strategies

Using this data to work through the HCM procedures will yield for each movement and approach:

bullet

capacity

bullet

v/c ratio

bullet

queue storage ratio

bullet

delay

bullet

level of service

Results of our analysis, including overall intersection delay and level of service, are shown in the following table:

Exhibit 5-23. Museum Road at Reitz Union Drive (120-sec cycle)

 

EB

WB

SB

L

T

R

L

T

R

L

T

R

Volumes

379

670

-

-

597

178

204

-

484

Queues

46

30

-

-

38

38

11

-

16

Delay

219

18

-

-

22

22

31

-

33

LOS

F

B

-

-

C

C

C

-

C

Intersection

Delay

53.4

LOS

D

Remember, since the HCM methodology assumes all lanes have adequate storage when computing delay, you must check the back-of-queue and queue storage ratio for each lane group to determine if there are queue storage problems.  (A queue storage ratio greater than 1.0 indicates estimated queues are greater than available storage).

With this analysis of the existing conditions at the Reitz Union Drive intersection, we will address intersection improvement strategies in the ensuing sub-problems.

Sub-problem 2a:Analyzing the effects of pedestrians

Sub-problem 2b:Analyzing the effects of signal phasing

Sub-problem 2c:Analyzing the effects of coordination
Discussion: Summary of Problem 2 results

 [ Back ] [ Continue ] to Sub-problem 2a