Results of our analysis, including overall intersection delay and level of
service, are shown in the following table:
Exhibit 5-23. Museum Road at Reitz
Union Drive (120-sec cycle) |
|
EB |
WB |
SB |
L |
T |
R |
L |
T |
R |
L |
T
|
R |
Volumes |
379 |
670 |
- |
- |
597 |
178 |
204 |
- |
484 |
Queues |
46 |
30 |
- |
- |
38 |
38 |
11 |
- |
16 |
Delay |
219 |
18 |
- |
- |
22 |
22 |
31 |
- |
33 |
LOS |
F |
B |
- |
- |
C |
C |
C |
- |
C |
Intersection |
Delay |
53.4 |
LOS |
D |
Remember, since the HCM methodology assumes all
lanes have adequate storage when computing delay, you must check the
back-of-queue and queue storage ratio for each lane group to determine if
there are queue storage problems. (A queue storage ratio greater than 1.0
indicates estimated queues are greater than available storage).
With this analysis of the existing conditions at the Reitz
Union Drive intersection, we will address intersection improvement
strategies in the ensuing sub-problems.
Sub-problem
2a:Analyzing the effects of pedestrians
Sub-problem
2b:Analyzing the effects of signal phasing
Sub-problem 2c:Analyzing the effects of coordination
Discussion: Summary of Problem 2 results
[
Back ] [
Continue ] to
Sub-problem 2a