Sub-problem 2a - Page 2 of 2 |
ID# C502A02 |
Sub-problem 2a:
Analyzing the Effects
of Pedestrians
Step 2: Results
To evaluate the
effects of this signal timing strategy, we will use the Chapter 16 HCM
operational methodology. Running the analysis
for a 120-second cycle results in the queues, delays, and LOS
values shown in Exhibit 5-24:
Exhibit 5-24. Museum Road at
Reitz Union Drive (Exclusive Ped Phase) |
|
EB |
WB
|
SB |
L |
T |
R |
L |
T |
R |
L |
T |
R |
Volumes |
379 |
670 |
- |
- |
597 |
178 |
204 |
- |
484 |
Queues |
42 |
28 |
- |
- |
36 |
36 |
16 |
- |
32 |
Delay |
168 |
16 |
- |
- |
19 |
19 |
72 |
- |
188 |
LOS |
F |
B |
- |
- |
C |
C |
E |
- |
F |
Intersection |
Delay |
77.5 |
LOS |
E |
While pedestrians are
accommodated more efficiently and more safely, the intersection performance
is worsened under this scenario, at least with respect to the LOS criterion.
On the southbound approach, LOS drops from C to E/F. Since pedestrians are restricted to crossing only the northbound
and westbound approaches (with the northbound approach closed to vehicles),
the need for an exclusive pedestrian phase is probably minimal, especially
with the deterioration of the intersection efficiency using this design.
[ Back ] [
Continue ] to
Sub-problem 2b