Subproblem 1b - Page 5 of 5 |
ID# C301B05 |
Sub-problem 1b:
Determining the Facility Class and Scope of the
Analysis
To summarize the discussion in this problem, Exhibit 3-10 describes the three
facilities that will be analyzed in subsequent problems of this case study.
The three facilities will be known as the north, center, and south sections,
respectively.
Exhibit 3-10.
Summary of Krome Avenue Facility Types for Analysis |
Section |
Boundaries |
Facility Type |
Class |
North |
Okeechobee to
Kendall |
Two-lane highway |
I |
Center |
Kendall to Eureka |
Two-lane highway |
I, II |
South |
Eureka to Avocado |
Signalized Arterial |
I |
Summary Discussion
The process of examining and characterizing roadways according to facility
type and by individual segments is an important step that has ramifications
on the outcome of the final analysis. As well, even the initial decision
about what portions of the roadway to include in the analysis can have a
significant effect. In the case of Krome Avenue, for example, there is
actually an additional 3.7-mile section that passes through the downtown
area of Homestead to the terminus of Krome Avenue with U.S. 1; we have not
included discussion of this portion of the roadway because we don't want to
add too many complexities all at once, but the real-world analysis probably
should include this portion of the roadway to assure completeness. The main
point that is being made here is that it is important to be careful and
thoughtful in defining the boundaries of the road facility and segments, and
to always consider the possible effects of these decisions on the overall
analysis. .
[ Back ] [ Continue ] to Sub-Problem
1c