Subproblem 3a - Page 4 of 5 |
ID# C303A04 |
Sub-problem
3a: Analysis of the North Section of Krome Avenue (Class I
Two-Lane Highway Facility)
Step 2. Results
The table below compares the results from the planning level
analysis in sub-problem 2a with the
operational level analysis. This table shows the values assumed by the
service volume tables for all parameters, as compared with the values that
apply to this facility. It shows the computations and results for both
methods. The average travel speed (ATS) was computed as 45.2 mph, which suggests LOS C. The
percent time-spent-following (PTSF)
was computed as 66.9%, which suggests LOS D.
So, the resulting LOS was based on the PTSF and was found to be LOS D. This result was identical to the LOS estimate given by the service volume
tables. The interpretation of the agreement between the two procedures is
that the sum total of all of the differences between the assumed parameters
and the site-specific parameters for this facility was not sufficient to
produce a difference in the estimated level of service.
Exhibit 3-18. Sub-Problem 2a Planning Analysis vs. Sub-Problem 3a
Operational Analysis |
Input Data |
Sub-problem 2a |
Sub-problem 3a |
Terrain |
Level |
Level |
Base Free Flow Speed |
N/A |
56.5 |
Access point / mile |
N/A |
1 |
Shoulder Width |
N/A |
3 |
Free Flow Speed |
55 |
55 |
Directional Split |
60/40 |
62/38 |
Percent Trucks |
14 |
27 |
Percent RV’s |
4 |
Included in Truck % |
Percent No Passing |
20 |
18 |
PHF |
N/A |
0.94 |
Design Hour Volume |
1,110 |
1,110 |
Comparison of Results |
Table
Thresholds |
|
Computations |
LOS A |
--- |
|
ATS = 45.2 mph |
LOS B |
330 |
PTSF = 66.9 |
LOS C |
870 |
v/c = 0.38 |
LOS D |
1,460 |
|
LOS E |
2,770 |
Estimated LOS: |
D |
D |
[ Back ] [
Continue ] with Sub-Problem 3a