Back Next

HCMAG Home
Overview
Introduction
Getting Started
Problem 1
Problem 2
Problem 3
Problem 4
Problem 5
Problem 6
Problem Index
Datasets
Search

Subproblem 3a - Page 4 of 5

ID# C303A04

Sub-problem 3a: Analysis of the North Section of Krome Avenue (Class I Two-Lane Highway Facility)

Step 2. Results

The table below compares the results from the planning level analysis in sub-problem 2a with the operational level analysis. This table shows the values assumed by the service volume tables for all parameters, as compared with the values that apply to this facility. It shows the computations and results for both methods. The average travel speed (ATS) was computed as 45.2 mph, which suggests LOS C. The percent time-spent-following (PTSF) was computed as 66.9%, which suggests LOS D.

So, the resulting LOS was based on the PTSF and was found to be LOS D. This result was identical to the LOS estimate given by the service volume tables. The interpretation of the agreement between the two procedures is that the sum total of all of the differences between the assumed parameters and the site-specific parameters for this facility was not sufficient to produce a difference in the estimated level of service. 

Exhibit 3-18. Sub-Problem 2a Planning Analysis vs. Sub-Problem 3a  Operational Analysis
Input Data Sub-problem 2a Sub-problem 3a
Terrain Level Level
Base Free Flow Speed N/A 56.5
Access point / mile N/A 1
Shoulder Width N/A 3
Free Flow Speed 55 55
Directional Split 60/40 62/38
Percent Trucks 14  27
Percent RV’s Included in Truck %
Percent No Passing 20 18
PHF N/A 0.94
Design Hour Volume 1,110  1,110

Comparison of Results

Table Thresholds

  Computations
LOS A   ---   ATS = 45.2 mph
LOS B 330 PTSF = 66.9
LOS C 870 v/c = 0.38
LOS D  1,460  
LOS E   2,770
Estimated  LOS: D D

[ Back ] [ Continue ] with Sub-Problem 3a