Subproblem 4b - Page 4 of 4 |
ID# C304B04 |
Sub-problem 4b:
Two-way Stop Control with
a Normal Urban Intersection Treatment
Exhibit 3-30 explains why
the capacity lines shown in
Exhibit 3-27 are in different places. The formula for computing the capacity
of a movement that must yield to an opposing movement is given in HCM
equation 17-3. This equation contains two parameters:
-
The critical gap,
which indicates the length of a gap in the opposing flow required to
accommodate the first queued vehicle trying to cross the opposing flow.
-
The follow-up time,
which indicates the additional gap length required to accommodate each
subsequent vehicle entering the same gap in the opposing traffic.
Larger values for each of
these parameters will lower the capacity for the entering movement. The
values shown in Exhibit 3-30 indicate lower values for the left turn crossing
the opposing traffic than for the minor street entry movements. This
indicates that drivers making left turns from the major street are able
to accept shorter gaps in the opposing traffic than drivers who are
entering the major street from a minor street approach. The result is a
higher capacity for the WBL movement compared to the NBL movement.
Exhibit 3-30. TWSC Analysis
with a Normal Urban Intersection Treatment |
Assumed
Parameters |
Movement |
Input Data |
EBT |
WBT |
NBL |
WBL |
NBR |
Volume (vph) |
2,010 |
358 |
257 |
120 |
433 |
Number of lanes |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Median storage
(vehicles) |
N/A |
N/A |
4 |
N/A |
N/A |
Percent trucks |
|
|
20 |
41 |
10 |
Analysis Results |
Critical gap
(sec) |
N/A |
N/A |
7.2 |
4.9 |
7.1 |
Follow up time
(sec) |
N/A |
N/A |
3.7 |
2.6 |
3.4 |
Adjusted flow
rate (vph) |
2010 |
358 |
257 |
120 |
433 |
Adjusted capacity
(vph) |
N/A |
N/A |
69 |
168 |
226 |
v/c ratio |
N/A |
N/A |
3.72 |
0.71 |
1.92 |
95% queue length
(veh) |
N/A |
N/A |
27.1 |
4.4 |
31.1 |
Delay (sev/veh) |
N/A |
N/A |
??? |
67 |
464 |
LOS |
N/A |
N/A |
F |
F |
F |
Simplifying Assumptions
Analysis
period=15 min
No pedestrians
No upstream
signals
PHF = 0.93 for
all movements
Level Terrain |
One of the objectives
of this exercise was to judge whether it is appropriate to consider the
intersection in the context of a normal urban intersection with TWSC
control. This task can be accomplished best by comparing the results in
Exhibit 3-30 with the corresponding results obtained by treating each of the
conflict points separately. We will examine the separation of conflict
points in the next sub-problem.
[
Back ] [
Continue ] to Sub-Problem
4c