| Subproblem 4b - Page 4 of 4 | ID# C304B04 | 
      
      
     
    Sub-problem 4b: 
    Two-way Stop Control with 
    a Normal Urban Intersection Treatment
    
    Exhibit 3-30 explains why 
    the capacity lines shown in
    Exhibit 3-27 are in different places. The formula for computing the capacity 
    of a movement that must yield to an opposing movement is given in HCM 
    equation 17-3. This equation contains two parameters: 
    
      - 
      
      The critical gap, 
      which indicates the length of a gap in the opposing flow required to 
      accommodate the first queued vehicle trying to cross the opposing flow. 
- 
      
      The follow-up time,
      which indicates the additional gap length required to accommodate each 
      subsequent vehicle entering the same gap in the opposing traffic. 
       
    Larger values for each of 
    these parameters will lower the capacity for the entering movement. The 
    values shown in Exhibit 3-30 indicate lower values for the left turn crossing 
    the opposing traffic than for the minor street entry movements. This 
    indicates that drivers making left turns from the major street are able 
    to accept shorter gaps in the opposing traffic than drivers who are 
    entering the major street from a minor street approach. The result is a 
    higher capacity for the WBL movement compared to the NBL movement.
    
      
        
          | 
          Exhibit 3-30. TWSC Analysis 
          with a Normal Urban Intersection Treatment | 
        
          | 
          Assumed 
          Parameters | Movement | 
        
          | 
          Input Data | 
          EBT | 
          WBT | 
          NBL | 
          WBL | 
          NBR | 
        
          | 
          Volume (vph) | 
          2,010 | 
          358 | 
          257 | 
          120 | 
          433 | 
        
          | 
          Number of lanes | 
          2 | 
          2 | 
          1 | 
          1 | 
          1 | 
        
          | 
          Median storage 
          (vehicles) | 
          N/A | 
          N/A | 
          4 | 
          N/A | 
          N/A | 
        
          | 
          Percent trucks | 
            | 
            | 
          20 | 
          41 | 
          10 | 
        
          | 
          Analysis Results | 
        
          | 
          Critical gap 
          (sec) | 
          N/A | 
          N/A | 
          7.2 | 
          4.9 | 
          7.1 | 
        
          | 
          Follow up time 
          (sec) | 
          N/A | 
          N/A | 
          3.7 | 
          2.6 | 
          3.4 | 
        
          | 
          Adjusted flow 
          rate (vph) | 
          2010 | 
          358 | 
          257 | 
          120 | 
          433 | 
        
          | 
          Adjusted capacity 
          (vph) | 
          N/A | 
          N/A | 
          69 | 
          168 | 
          226 | 
        
          | 
          v/c ratio | 
          N/A | 
          N/A | 
          3.72 | 
          0.71 | 
          1.92 | 
        
          | 
          95% queue length 
          (veh) | 
          N/A | 
          N/A | 
          27.1 | 
          4.4 | 
          31.1 | 
        
          | 
          Delay (sev/veh) | 
          N/A | 
          N/A | 
          ??? | 
          67 | 
          464 | 
        
          | 
          LOS | 
          N/A | 
          N/A | 
          F | 
          F | 
          F | 
        
          | 
    Simplifying Assumptions 
          Analysis 
          period=15 min 
          No pedestrians 
          No upstream 
          signals 
          PHF = 0.93 for 
          all movements 
          Level Terrain | 
      
     
    
    One of the objectives 
    of this exercise was to judge whether it is appropriate to consider the 
    intersection in the context of a normal urban intersection with TWSC 
    control. This task can be accomplished best by comparing the results in 
    Exhibit 3-30 with the corresponding results obtained by treating each of the 
    conflict points separately. We will examine the separation of conflict 
    points in the next sub-problem.
[
    Back ] [
    Continue ] to Sub-Problem 
    4c